Playboy's March Cover Girl Is Less Naked...

...compared to some of the other men's magazine's for the March issues. Sorry to harp on this naked thing lately, but, I think it's starting to get too over the top. I find it so ironic that the cover girl of the magazine that features naked women inside actually has more clothes on than other men's magazines that don't feature nekkid gals in their editorial.

I'd love to hear from the guy's in the audience. Does a practically naked woman on the cover make you more inclined to buy the magazine? Do you think the overtly provocative sexual poses and skimpier outfits is getting a bit over the top or is fine, magazines are just doing what they gotta do to sell copies?

Because obviously, the trend is to put naked or near naked women on covers to sell more issues. Remember too Jennifer Aniston in her tie and birthday suit for GQ, and now we have Heidi Klum naked in Germany GQ. Isn't GQ supposed to be about men's fashion or did I miss something?

Playboy March 2009 with Aubrey O'Day

Maxim US March 2009 with Eliza Dushka

GQ Germany March 2009 with Heidi Klum who is just plain old nekkid

And of course, as we ughed about before, Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue 2009 with Bar Refaeli. Pretty soon this will just turn into the "Sports Illustrated Naked Issue."